On the other hand, the Pacific Bank argued that the land really should be partitioned in a means that may give them a larger share in the land. The courtroom in the end ruled in favor of Hannah, getting that the Pacific Bank was not entitled to a bigger share https://leaseholdandtenancylawyer55403.blogadvize.com/38192212/easements-and-rights-of-way-lawyer-in-karachi-no-further-a-mystery