The plaintiff introduced contradictory pleas, alleging that the mutations ended up both fraudulent and bogus. Dissimilarities had been mentioned within the donor’s signature during the transfers/mutations, as well as the CNIC number of the donor wasn't outlined. Disputed Ownership: Two on the donor’s sons, who appeared as witnesses, denied that https://easements-and-rights-of-w72491.blogzet.com/about-illegal-encroachments-wakeel-in-karachi-46027695